family, parenting, punishment

Frank Answers About Corporal Punishment

Question:
Dear Frank 
I am raising  my two boys and we have as a couple discussed the use of corporal punishment. The boys are too young at the moment but we want to decide before they get to a certain age whether it is right to spank or not. We don’t live in a country where it is illegal to do so. 

I was spanked as a child by my parents not harshly and believe when used in moderation it is a good tool to have especially for boys. My wife disagrees. The bible speaks a lot about this but some of this is out if tune with modern thinking and norms. Your advice which is great on so many subjects would be helpful.
Thanks, Stuart

Dear Stuart (and all parents of young children),

How to discipline your child is a never-ending debate. Spanking has been a “tool” in the disciplinary tool kit and still is for many parents. But there’s no doubt that opinions have been changing about the wisdom and effectiveness of spanking your kids.

My mother was quick with her hand, especially her backhand, when I was a boy. There was no interval between the crime and the punishment. I don’t remember my father ever spanking us, and sometimes he objected to my mother’s quickness to hit us. She once got me in the back of the head as I ducked under the table and he said, “Don’t hit the boy in the head.” Another time, however, as I ducked under the dining room table she hit her hand on the wood instead of my butt. Everyone laughed, and finally so did she (as she held her smarting hand).

Later in life she regretted that she had been so hard of us. “If I did that today they’d arrest me for child abuse,” she said. But apart from her quick temper, she wasn’t alone in terms of parents inflicting corporal punishment. It was common lore from my friends in our neighborhood that they could be spanked with father’s belt or mom’s big wooden spoon. The one benefit I could see to my situation is that the punishment was immediate and then done with. I didn’t have to hear, “Wait until your father gets home”…and then wait. I’m sure that was agony.

I don’t recall hitting or spanking any of my three children. I won’t say “never,” because they pushed my button on a number of occasions.  Certainly my wife never laid hands on them except in love. I might add that I never received any hugs from my parents. In the stoical 1950s blue collar households I guess that wasn’t done. To be touched in anger but not in love is not a good thing. I learned to hug my kids as they were growing up and I still do so now that they are adults.

Home and school were in sync as far as punishment was concerned back in the 1950s. Corporal punishment was still possible in the schools. Assistant principals were usually in charge of discipline, but in my school the administration of corporal punishment was left to the girls’ gym teacher. You didn’t want to be sent to see Miss Petersen, and I’m glad I never had to experience her administration of discipline. But for any infractions the elementary school assistant principal called the parents, and even if there was no corporal punishment at school the kids could be sure of receiving it when they got home.

Some teachers who applied the rod were legendary. Our diminutive Irish music teacher in elementary school used her baton to whack kids on the head who weren’t paying attention in class or those in the orchestra who kept playing wrong notes. (Mrs. Hull was, nevertheless, a favorite teacher at the school.) The kids who went to the Catholic parochial school told about the sisters who would smack their hands with a ruler for various infractions. Heaven help you if you were sent to the mother superior who would whack your butt (girls as well as boys). But I guess this was nothing in comparison with the punishment at British boarding schools, which has been the subject of novels and movies.

Today caning and other forms of corporate punishment in the schools is illegal in the UK. However, the British penchant for caning was carried to countries that once constituted the British Empire and is still practiced in those countries today, including Singapore and Malasia and several countries in Africa. Singapore is also known for its judicial caning on the bare butt of naked victims.

Boy is publicly caned in Singapore at a school assembly. Singapore allows only the caning of boys. Girls receive an alternative punishment, such as detention.

In many Asian countries corporal punishment, including caning, is practiced by parents even if it is not practiced in the schools. Smacking a child’s hand with a ruler or a stick is common for ordinary infractions. Caning is reserved for more serious offences. But sometimes the punishment of a child by parents has seemed excessive and there is conversation about the appropriateness and value of physically abusing children and youth as a form of punishment.

This Thai boy was given corporal punishment by his step-father. It looks like he was caned on his whole backside.

In the US schools corporal punishment is still legal in 19 states, mostly across the South and Southwest. A disproportionate number of African American children receive corporal punishment in the schools and by their parents in the their homes and even in public places. Reasons for this are complicated, including the facts that corporal punishment by flogging was practiced by masters on slaves, that African-Americans are more religious generally and believe that the Bible teaches parents to discipline their children, and that “whupping” a child is thought to help communicate the idea to children that they have to be respectful to their elders and to observe ways to be safe in their communities.

This photo captured a Black mother in Texas hitting her son with a belt for being disrespectful to his teacher.

It’s not illegal in the UK or US for parents to apply corporal punishment to their children. Court cases have upheld the right of parents to spank their children. But in my view dads and moms should use their belts to hold up their pants and their wooden spoons for stirring the soup. Corporal punishment is neither as biblical nor as effective as many people think.

I know that passages in the Bible have been used to support corporal punishment and conservative Christians think that spanking is God’s wisdom on how to raise children. As is often the case, however, people read into biblical passages what they assume on the basis of their culture. The famous phrase “spare the rod and spoil the child” was actually coined by a 17th century English poet and satirist names Samuel Butler in his poem Hudibras. He may have been paraphrasing Proverbs 13:24, which reads in the 1611 King James Version, “He that spareth his rod hateth his son; but he who loves him chasteneth him betimes.” The “rod” in question is the shepherd’s crook, which was used to keep the sheep from straying and to show them the right path. Remember Psalm 23? “Thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me.” Thus, using the rod in this verse has to do with the father providing guidance for his son more than it has to do with punishment.   

Hebrews 12:7-11 is also cited by those Christians who espouse corporal punishment. It speaks of a discipline which seems painful. But I would note that the passage begins with an admonition to “Endure trials for the sake of discipline (paideian).” The trials the author is speaking of are the trials of faith. The experience of suffering sets the Christian alongside Christ, “the pioneer and perfecter of our faith,” and should therefore be welcomed as a chastening or purifying of God’s people. The word “discipline” (paideia) refers to education. From it we get the word “disciple,” one who learns the way.

Children have to be taught. What are they learning if they are subjected to physical pain for poor judgment or infraction of the rules?  Parents are usually angry when they hit or spank their children. Since children learn more from their parents’ actions than from their words, they learn to strike when they are angry. They learn aggressive behavior. And while the questioner is thinking about whether or not to spank his boys when they get older, girls have also been subject of a hand, paddle, or even a belt applied on the behind from either mother or father.

Even if the parent doesn’t spank immediately but sets up a ritual of spanking like the solemn school canings were, the child learns body shame (especially if their pants are pulled down for the spanking). The bare buttocks were exposed to prevent boys from padding their pants to lesson the pain. But to have their butt exposed and subjected to such treatment, sometimes even in front of other family members (or in school in front of other miscreants who were awaiting their turn with the cane), means that the youth has been totally humiliated. An older child might even shift the focus to the parent’s behavior rather than to what can be learned from his own behavior, which would make the punishment totally undermining its intended affect.

Moreover, spanking or paddling a child can be risky for the child. The child can be struck in a truly harmful way by injuring a body organ. In a small child there are a number of organs near the buttocks and the parent can’t assume that his or her aim is accurate, especially if the child squirms (which he is likely to do as painful punishment is being applied). Moreover, Elizabeth Gershoff, PhD, a leading researcher on physical punishment at the University of Texas at Austin says: “Physical punishment doesn’t work to get kids to comply, so parents think they have to keep escalating it. That is why it is so dangerous,” she says. This is what leads to genuine child abuse.

So how can we discipline our children without spanking them?  There are forms of punishment that don’t involve physical pain. If there’s an issue at the dinner table, the child can be sent away or denied desert. If there’s an altercation with siblings, the child (or all of them) can be given “time out” in their special “time out place.” If the fight is over a toy, the toy can be removed. If the child throws a tantrum, the parents should remain calm until the child calms down. If the child hits, he or she can be removed from the room. The object is to remove the child from a social situation because of anti-social behavior. A moral lesson can be taught if the parent is not one who hits. He or she can say to a child who hits a parent, “I don’t hit you. Why are you hitting me? We don’t hit people in this house.”

Time out is in an open space, not sequestered in his bedroom or locked in a closet.

The teen age years present special difficulties. You’re not going to put your teen age son over your knee or treat his bare butt to a paddling. There are the time-honored punishments of being grounded and removing internet or driving privileges, depending on the infraction. The lesson here is that with maturity comes responsibility and privileges are taken away until they can be handled responsibly. I saw one cartoon in which the father says to his son, “you’re grounded, remember? You can’t go out with your friends tonight.” The son responds, “Couldn’t I get the belt instead?” In any event, this is already leading to a conversation if the parent wants to make use of it.

Obviously, the other side of discipline is positive reinforcement and effusive praise to reward children for good behavior. When a naughty action has been diffused and the child is calmed down, take the time to sit down and discuss it with the child. Affirm that you love the child and end the conversation with a hug. Finding creative ways to discipline a child and have the child learn something positive at the same time is hard work. But it is noble work. I wish you well in your child rearing.

Pastor Frank Senn 

   

2 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Jeff

    I grew up in a time when bare bottom spankings followed by pants down corner time was common practice for boys. Back then I don’t think anyone questioned the wisdom of it. It was just the way things were, the way things had always been.

    Being spanked was a no fun at all! But there was also a very powerful sexual element that I found very confusing. Just thinking about being spanked would often give me an erection. Once I learned how to masturbate I would sometimes think about my friends and I being spanked as I engaged in this activity.

    Aside from swimming and spankings there was a strictly enforcement nudity taboo for us boys. A boy might well be spanked for having appeared in his underwear before his sisters. Why this should be I didn’t know. Until age 14 we didn’t wear swimsuits for meets so it wasn’t as if people didn’t know what we looked like down there.

    I suppose there’s no way to explain it. Did the spankings cause me any lasting damage? No they didn’t. But it’s just as well that they’ve fallen out of practice.

  2. Avatar

    Andrew

    Depending on your environment and community, corporal punishment was expected of parents when I was a boy. If a boy transgressed in his behavior and was openly disrespectful or defiant, other adults would look to the parents like, “Why don’t you do something about this?” And your social life was limited if other parents perceived a boy as a trouble maker

    I think that parents disciplined their children as they were disciplined by their parents. I was disciplined much like Jeff. At school, we were paddled — a policy strongly supported by most parents at the time. I think that anytime that fathers used the strap or belt on their sons, it was always on the bare bottom. I guess this was for effect and to make sure they knew when to quit. Coaches and PE instructors sometimes made you drop your gym shorts for a paddling while your bare buttocks were swatted through your jockstrap. But there were only males present, so what was indecent or humiliating about this? Very shortly after wrestling practice, you would be lining up for totally nude weigh-ins. Were the bare bottom swats more humiliating that the fact that you were paddled?

    Regarding a sexual component, I think that anyone who goes through Freudian psychoanalysis will be told there is sexuality in everything. However, I do not think that there was sexuality in the practices of the mid 20th century. They tended to be a result of practicality. Spanking and corporal punishment, like nude swimming, mandatory group showers, and jockstraps were not intended to be sexual. Today we tend to attach sexual meanings to them. But these were also accepted practices at the time.

    Some of these practices may have become contemporary sexual fetishes, like BDSM, infantilism, exhibitionism, and cross-dressing. One can say there were sexual components in fraternity hazing acts, but are there or have there been any fraternities that are without them? There were and still are high school fraternities. (All members are below the age of consent.) I think that the sexual element is something perceived today that was not perceived at the time they were in practice. They tell us more about our viewpoints today.

Leave a Reply