Question: You’ve written articles on your blog with the theme of nakedness. You’re bold to tackle some of the issues you write about, especially your articles dealing with sexual practices. You also include many images in these these articles that display nudity, which is even bolder since you are a respected pastor and scholar. What compels you to push the theme of nakedness? What do you think about the role of modesty from a Christian perspective?
Warning: nude images
Frank answers: Thank you for asking these questions. I admit that because I am a pastor (retired) and a theologian (still working) some Christians may be scandalized by the issues I have discussed in my blog articles — especially articles dealing with sexual practices and several articles dealing explicitly with nakedness — and maybe even more so by the images of nude bodies I have included in the articles.
I started this blog to answer questions if I am able to. Sex is a major issue in life, often fraught with controversy. Many pastors just avoid discussing it, unless they’re caught up in the culture wars. Many of my articles concern the body and embodiment, especially in the areas of liturgy and spirituality. You can’t focus on the body without paying attention to its biological reality as well as its role in society and culture. Nor can you ignore sexuality, as many theologians and philosophers have done, since it is a source of the body’s energy and vitality. (We wouldn’t be alive without sex!) Frankly, by being willing to tackle some of the questions I have received, I’ve had to do research and think through how I would answer.
I actually wrote Frank Answers about the body already in my earliest posts, such as the Resurrection Body and Tattoos, More About the Resurrection Body, The Body–God’s and Ours. Then I received and answered a question about pornography and that led to a student (high school, I think) asking me about masturbation. I believe that because I answered those questions in a non-judgmental manner (but not without raising some questions to ponder), other readers felt free to ask further questions along these lines. On questions about issues like masturbation, anal and oral sex, and homosexuality my object was to sort out what the Bible says from what it doesn’t say — as I will also do in this article about nakedness and modesty.
I also wrote about swimming naked back in the days of my youth, such as in high school physical education class, with many vintage photos. See Frank Answers About Swimming Naked. This article elicited hundreds of comments. The comments became so voluminous that I posted one and then two curated anthologies of the comments, with more vintage photos, which elicited more comments. Much of the discussion was about whether some of the photos had been photo shopped. Indeed, I found that some of them had been. But incredulity also had to do with the horror some readers expressed that teen age boys might have swum naked in front of women, whether physical education teachers or spectators.
The issue of protecting the boys’ modesty was raised in some comments. Girls’ modesty was taken for granted in that they usually wore swimming suits even though the American Association of Public Health had recommended both nude showering and nude swimming in pools because of bacteria on the old woolen suits. (This guidance, first given in 1926, was reiterated every four years until 1962.) Showering required using soap all over the body for common hygiene for both girls and boys (separately, of course_.
Part of my witness in using nude images is that I believe there is nothing inherently sinful about the body. Our bodies are part of God’s good creation — all of our body. There’s nothing sinful about breasts and penises. I do not display hard core pornography on my site, although some readers might think that showing a breast or a penis or images just suggesting a sex act is already pornographic. How much nakedness is in Bible? Count the ways in Lucas Cranach the Elder’s painting, “The Allegory of Law and Gospel.” Cranach was the illustrator of Luther’s German Bible.
Many people in American society have difficulty accepting their bodily selves. There are many reasons for this. Many of us were raised with teachings about modesty that were inculcated by religion and society. In America, we have lived with puritanical laws about “public indecency,” which includes even such natural practices as breast feeding infants. Our consumer culture, on the other hand, makes use of nudity and sexuality in advertising to sell products. This includes the projection of the ideal bodies of models that few of us can replicate in our own bodies. Our attitudes toward our bodies is very much influenced by the consumer culture in which we live and move and have our being.
Some people obsess about their body shape and size, even down to their feet. (In practicing foot washing, I’ve been amazed by how many people are ashamed of their feet.) The body is a perennial concern of adolescents whose bodies are still growing. They naturally compare their bodies with their peers and are anxious about their growth. To have their body criticized in any way by others can be devastating to their fragile egos. I would like to help liberate attitudes about the human body in general so that people are more accepting of their own bodies, and therefore of themselves, and are therefore more confident in their human relationships.
In the Beginning
Christian discussion of nakedness and modesty has to go back to the story of creation and fall in Genesis 2-3 (the so-called Jahwist or J-narrative). This narrative begins with the affirmation of nakedness and ends with the Lord God clothing the naked bodies of Adam and Eve. This has been taken by Jewish and Christian teachers as an endorsement of the need for modesty in a fallen world. The Genesis narrative says that in the beginning the man and the woman were naked and unashamed.
I won’t rehearse here the story of the temptation by the serpent to get Eve to eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that they were instructed by the Lord not to touch. It’s a fascinating account since seduction and rationalization for giving into it is a constant human situation. But the first result of disobeying God’s command not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is that “the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made loin cloths for themselves.” Eating the forbidden fruit made them aware of things they had not been aware of before. In a sense by making loin cloths (actually aprons) to specifically cover their genitals, they were intentionally hiding their most intimate parts from God and from each other. This was not because they suddenly discovered modesty. It was because their relationship with God and with each other was impaired by their knowing act of disobeying God. Intimate relationships had been damaged and so they covered their intimate parts by which, as the Bible says, we “know” (i.e. have sex with) others.
Secondly, they hid themselves from the Lord when they heard the sound of him walking in the garden. When the Lord called them out from hiding, Adam’s excuse was “I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.” God knew immediately they had eaten of the tree, because otherwise how would they have known they were naked. The word translated “naked” here actually means “exposed.” The Lord questions Adam, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?” With that the blaming game began: Adam blamed Eve for giving him the fruit and Eve blamed the serpent for causing her to disbelieve God’s word.
Each character received punishment. The couple was expelled from the garden, lest they take also from the tree of life and live forever. But in an act of grace, “the Lord God made garments of skin for the man and his wife, and clothed them.” The text gives no reason for the Lord God making clothing. A logical guess would be for protection from the elements, which perhaps had not been an issue in the paradise garden. But nothing is said about the need for modesty or that human nakedness is wrong , if not sinful.
My Personal Experiences of Nakedness
Nakedness is not inherently sinful. We are born naked. Children in many societies in warmer climes may often be in a state of undress up to a certain age. Little children delight to run run naked in the house when getting ready for a bath. Up to what age this is allowed depends on the family and the social context and cultural setting. Usually by the time puberty sets in children are expected to be dressed when they interact with the family or others in the house because the developing sexuality of the body needs to be covered.
Our dad used to take our family to visit a family he knew from during the Great Depression in the 1930s when he worked on their farm. In the 1950s the family had resettled in a large house in Perry, NY. Their older children were married adults but their youngest son, nicknamed Buster, was about two years older than me. Buster introduced me to the joys and pleasures of nakedness.
When we were visiting the Shermans, I slept with Buster in his bedroom in the back of the second floor of the their large house which warmed up during the day. On the first night of our yearly visit the year I was 12 and Buster was 13 going on 14, he told me that he slept naked in the summer in front of an open window with the fan blowing a breeze on his body and he invited me to try it. It was my first experience of sleeping naked. I liked it and I have done it often since then.
Buster and I were sent to a field to collect raspberries. While we were out there, hidden by a grove of trees from the road, he suggested that we get naked and run around through the trees, which we did with wild abandon.
When I was 13 we visited another family that lived in the country. They had a son named Roy who was about three years older than me. He invited me for an afternoon swim in a nearby creek. I didn’t have a bathing suit but he said we could go skinny dipping if the girls didn’t come. This is what boys did in the 1950s and earlier, especially in secluded areas.
I relate youthful experiences of being naked with friends in Frank Answers About Swimming Naked (and the related Commentaries I and II articles) and Frank Answers About Returning to Nature. I spent many hours showering and swimming naked with other boys in high school freshman PE Swimming Class. I had a wonderful experience of swimming naked on a Scout camping trip in the summer of my fifteenth year (1958) with three other Scouts. Hiking up the South Branch Cattaraugus Creek we discovered a swimming hole to which we returned each day.
The summer before I began high school our family began taking our summer vacation in the Adirondacks in northeastern New York State. We stayed on the property of a Scouting family we knew in Buffalo. They had a son named Tom who was my age and we were able to do a lot together — boating, hiking, mountain climbing. I was also able to go off on my own canoeing or hiking. Climbing a mountain alone and with no one else on the trail I undressed and allowed my body to feel the sensuousness of the warm sun, the breeze on my skin, and the earth under my feet.
The nude male body in natural surroundings has not been as prevalent in art as the nude female body. It’s a Romantic concept and one of the best examples is the late Classical/early Romantic work of Anne-Louis Girodet de Roucy-Trioson, The Sleep of Endymion (1791). The male body portrayed by Girodet has feminine as well as masculine qualities.
Off to college in 1961. Dorm life involved a lot of nudity. You pretty quickly got used to undressing with your roommate in the room. As you got used to your roommate and dorm mates who might wander in uninvited, you felt comfortable just hanging out in your all together.
In our dormitory there was an open shower on each floor and a row of sinks in the bathroom where we shaved and groomed ourselves. We young men walked around the hallways and bathroom areas with a towel wrapped around our waists (sometimes). I think most of us took in stride being naked in our communal living, even when our German dorm mother was on the floor. She seemed to take our nudity in stride also.
For several reasons naked communal showering came to an end by the 1980s. In suburban homes with several bathrooms boys and girls became more used to privacy once they reached puberty. They stopped showering after gym classes and learned to dress and undress without completing exposing their bodies. Homophobia became an issue. Boys either became afraid of being hit on by gay boys and gay boys became afraid of being exposed as gay by their erections (as if all boys don’t get them!). Colleges followed the trend by providing individual shower stalls for the sake of modesty. Dorm suites began to replace individual rooms. It has became possible for roommates to never see each other naked. I think a lot was lost in terms of male camaraderie with the loss of social nakedness. Was the experience of being naked with one another homoerotic? Yes, but eros is about more than sex. It is really about passionate love in all its forms
Revival of Public Nudity in the Age of Aquarius
The decade of the 1960s marked the beginnings of the sexual revolution. The magazine most associated with this movement in America was Playboy, founded by Hugh Hefner in 1960. It projected a seemingly free sexual life style of scantily clad “bunnies” running around Hugh Hefner’s mansion while he worked in his silk bathrobe. American boys (and men) sneaked copies of Playboy home and stashed them in his closet where his Mom (or wife) wouldn’t find them (but usually did). While college students said they bought it for its literate articles, the nude centerfolds were the great marketing ploy.
In 1973 Playgirl magazine debuted under the editorship of Marin Scott Milan. It was billed as “a sex-positive, fun-oriented feminist response to Hugh Hefner’s empire.” It featured hunks on the cover and throughout and a full frontal nude centerfold photo. It’s content was a bit more sex-oriented than Playboy.
The Hippie culture embraced nudity as a way of raising questions about American attitudes toward the body left over from Victorian Era puritanism. The Rock Musical Hair became the manifesto of the Hippie culture. It was revolutionary in its featuring of on-stage nudity. The play was first present in off-Broadway theaters in New York in 1967 and went on Broadway in April 1968.
While nudity was confined to the stage in Hair, the Hippies provided provocative examples of public nudity at the mass gathering in Woodstock, NY for the Music Festival in held August 15–18, 1969 on Max Yasgur’s dairy farm. As thousands of young people camped out on the farm property they availed themselves of the lake for bathing.
Hippie camps and gatherings were clothing optional. They used nudity as a form of protest against prevalent attitudes about decency and pressed the question, “Why is nudity considered obscene?” They portrayed it as a natural state and disconnected it from sex (although not excluding sex).
In contrast to Playboy magazine, the Hippies modeled a new aesthetic of the raw beauty of the naked human body. The consumer culture began to tap into this new aesthetic in the early 1970s. Soon models in more main steam publications were photographed wearing less makeup and were often pictured in naturalistic surroundings.
Examples of Nakedness In Europe
In the summer of 1968 I traveled in Europe for the first time. I went back again several times in the early 1970s, I learned than Europeans were more open to public nudity than Americans. The Germans especially felt it was healthy to be naked in nature. This idea emerged in the late nineteenth century in the Freikörperkultur (free body culture) as a response to life in an urban-industrial society, although it was suppressed during the Nazi Era because it was seen as espousing Marxist ideas and promoting homosexuality. After World War II Germans, especially in East Germany, undressed for sun bathing in public parks and on clothing optional beaches, perhaps as a way of expressing a sense of freedom in a Communist society.
In Finland, Sweden, Russia, and Estonia family saunas are popular in which families or groups of friends gather for health, spirituality, business, and camaraderie.
The people who sit in the sauna to allow the heat to bring toxins out of their bodies will eventually run out and jump in a cold lake or pond, like this Estonian family emerging from their country sauna.
As in Germany, Danes and Swedes sunbathed on Baltic beaches and swam naked in lakes by their summer homes. When I was in Sweden on Midsommardag in 1975, which often included lakeside gatherings with a bonfire, some of the young people went for swims in the dusk of the midnight sun.
The naturist movement began in Europe in the early twentieth century and gained momentum again after World War II beginning in the 1970s. It is committed to living in harmony with nature and practicing non-sexual social nudity and has different organizations in different countries. In Europe and North America naturist clubs provide outdoor nudist camping experiences for whole families. Surprisingly, many Christians participate in the naturist movement.
A new self-published book by Baptist teacher Aaron Frost comments on all the passages in the Bible that deal with nakedness and modesty and gives examples of nudity and clothing in various cultures. He concludes that Christians today are actually more beholding to Victorian Era social mores and contemporary cultural expectations than to what the Bible actually says about being naked. I recommend it to those Christians who have difficulty with nudity, although I find his predictions about increasing nakedness in American society overly optimistic. Nor do I endorse his enthusiasm for naked group worship. Frost does correctly point out that many Christians have been in the forefront of the naturist movement.
Nakedness in the Bible
From the Christian point of view there’s nothing sinful about being naked. As we saw, according to the Book of Genesis, Adam and Eve were “naked and unafraid” before their situation changed with the forbidden fruit incident. Wearing clothing was a concession to their fallen state and expulsion from the garden. No reason was given for the Lord making clothing for the man and the woman. I think the gift of clothing can be seen as protection in the hard world outside of paradise they were entering. But If the gift of clothing was the basis of the need for modesty in human society, as some have argued, then modesty must be regarded as a concession to human sin. We need protection from one another. But that doesn’t make nakedness wrong. This distinction has eluded many Christians.
The Bible makes many matter-of-fact references to nakedness (which can even be a spiritual state) but actually says very little about modesty in our modern understanding of covering the body, especially the “private parts.” The only detailed specifications of clothing in the Bible concern the high priest’s vestments, even down to the details of his underwear, when he serves before the presence of the Lord in the Tabernacle and Temple. As usual, the Torah gives no explanation for this. It has been proposed that the high priest could not allow his manhood to show before Israel’s alpha male, Yahweh.
Our current American understandings of modesty and attitudes toward nudity are not the Bible’s understandings and attitudes. They are a product of our own puritan culture, especially as modesty was exaggerated in the Victorian Era during the second half of the 19th century. Nakedness was a fact of life in the biblical world. Fishermen hauling in their nets, farmers hoeing their fields, hunters tracking prey, athletes competing in the games, men and women in the public baths were all naked (as is evident in ancient drawings and mosaics).
Early Christian mosaics portray Jesus naked when being baptized by John the Baptist in the River Jordan. This probably reflected the fact, attested in texts from the church fathers, that Christian baptism was performed on naked bodies, both male and female.
Vietnamese theologian Dan Le published his dissertation on The Naked Christ: An Atonement Model for a Body Obsessed Culture (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2012), in which he proposes the totally naked (no loin cloth) crucified Christ as a redemptive answer to a culture of fitness obsession and body shame. By his atoning sacrifice Jesus has absorbed all our sin. He has also absorbed all of our shame. He was stripped and exposed, so that even until the end his atoning sacrifice would be seen as victorious over our sin and shame as well as, in his resurrection, victory over death.
Naked/enclothed was a prominent part of what Christ did “for us and for our salvation.” He was born as a naked infant and wrapped in swaddling cloths. He was stripped naked to “suffer under Pontius Pilate” in his flogging and then clothed in a purple robe with a crown of thorns on his head. He was stripped again to be crucified. Romans didn’t allow loin cloths for their victims; this was an act of public humiliation. He died, was taken down from the cross, wrapped in burial linens and laid in a borrowed tomb. On the third day he rose from the dead and Peter and John found the burial linens laid aside. We have no idea what he wore when he left the tomb, if anything.
Christ’s own body shows the contradictory aspects of nakedness in the contrast between the degradation of his body in his flogging and crucifixion and his glorified body in the resurrection (which still bore of the marks of the nails and the spear). Likewise, the ancient Greeks glorified the male body yet Achilles dragged the naked dead body of Hector through the Greek camp at Troy as an act of degradation. The Roman nobility proudly displayed their naked bodies in the baths, yet humiliated the bodies of slaves by stripping them naked on the auction block.
Those who were baptized into Christ’s death and resurrection were stripped naked for a full body anointing and immersion in a pool of water, not unlike the rituals of the Roman bath. Their nakedness suggested not only the identification with the crucified Savior but a return to the innocence of the paradise garden (Cyril of Jerusalem). When they emerged from the font they were clothed in a white robe. The dialectic of naked/enclothed is prominent in rites of initiation in many traditional societies and in religions.
In Frank Answers About the Meaning(s) of the Body I discuss this dialectic of being naked/enclothed and how it relates to the several meanings of the body discussed by Mark Johnson in The Meaning of the Body (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007) as simultaneously biological, environmental, phenomenological, social, and cultural. Our natural state is nakedness, but our nakedness is covered against the elements for protection since humans lack fur. We experience the sensations of being both naked and clothed. The degree to which we are naked or clothed depends on social regulations and cultural expectations.
Our contemporary American problem with social nudity is that it is strictly confined in our society to places like gym locker rooms and clothing optional beaches. Apart from being naked in our households, we we don’t usually experience nakedness except in films and advertisements. We associate nudity with sex. In our experience and expectation, getting naked is what people do when they’re getting undressed in the expectation of having sex. Helping your partner get undressed in order to reveal by removal of items what is under the clothing is a very erotic activity and usually a part of foreplay.
The Consumer Body
We are an enclothed society. Modesty is good for business because clothing is one of our biggest consumer items. The clothes we buy and wear are called “fashion statements.” We’re careful about what we put on our bodies because our clothing choices are part of our self-identity and the identity we want to project in society. “Clothing makes the man,” says one classic advertisement.
Ironically, while clothing provides the modesty we think we need in a fallen world, covering especially our “private” body parts, advertisers get us to buy clothing by modeling it a way that draws attention precisely to those “forbidden” body parts. Over the years the forbidden body parts have changed as more and more has been revealed. First it was the calf or shoulder. Then the skirts got shorter and the belt lines came down. Soon the navel was exposed. Now, in fashionable women’s evening gowns, much of the breast can be shown as long as the nipple is covered. Now men wear low hanging, tight-fitting jeans that call attention to the crotch. In our clothing we are becoming more nude. But we are not yet naked. That could be because nude is sexy; naked is not.
Part of our obsession about our body is that we want to be confident that our naked form will be as appealing as our clothed state. Our clothing selection is seldom our own choice. Clothing designers decide what styles will appeal to people and push those. Usually they are styles that appeal to younger men and women. The younger set are attracted now to tight-fitting clothing rather than the baggy look. But to look attractive in those tight pants and shirts and jackets you have to have a thin and trim body, otherwise you’re bulging at the seems. This sends people to gyms and onto running paths to tone up. Fitness for the young is really about fitting into those tight clothes, which in turn reveal the fine form of the body under them.
Nude versus Naked
Why is nude more sexy than naked? Art critic John Berger once said, “To be naked is to be oneself. To be nude is to be seen by others and yet not recognized for oneself.” Science writer Dorion Sagan wrote in his little book, Sex (White River Junction, VT: Chelsee Green, 2009), “Nakedness is pretty straightforward. It is exposure. What you see is what you get. The allure of nudity is subtler. What is still concealed is equal to or greater than what is revealed. What you see is not what you get. Partial revelation triggers temptation, seduction, the dance of desire” (p. 7). Nakedness is our natural state. We were born naked. When our nakedness is covered, the eye wants to see what’s under the covering, especially in those areas considered to be forbidden to display in public, such as breasts and genitalia.
A way of distinguishing between the concepts of “naked” and “nude” is the practice of providing a live body in an art class for the art students to draw according to their perspective, often from different vantage points. They are drawing a three-dimensional naked body but on paper it becomes a nude because the entire body cannot be seen. There is more to be revealed that the artist does not show.
Here is a live naked model being transformed into a nude on canvas.
Appreciating the Nude
The nude figure has been the subject of countless paintings and sculptures. There are a number of reasons for this. The most basic reason is that the human form is beautiful to look at and varied in its shapes. Our bodies are full of curves, cones, cylinders, spheres, and other shapes, which can be drawn on paper or shaped in clay or stone. Artists play with skin tone colors, light and shadows, expressions of emotion, anatomical realism, or abstract impressions. All the meanings of the body are incorporated in the artistic nude body. Through art we come to appreciate the body — all bodies — as they are, imperfections and all, in relation to their environment, within their society, and against their cultural background. Here are two famous nudes from the early Romantic Era.
Christian artists in the Renaissance explored the naked body as no artists had done since the time of ancient Greece. They were interested in the anatomical body, the body’s proportions, as well as its social position. Michelangelo festooned the walls and ceilings of the Sistine Chapel with nude bodies. He fashioned sculptures of the naked bodies of David and the risen Christ. When it came to Christ, except as an infant, some discreet veiling of the genitals was required. But the 19 year old Michelangelo also presented a monastery with a crucifix that featured the naked body of Christ on the cross. Lucas Cranach the Elder of Wittenberg, friend and supporter of Martin Luther, who painted famous portraits of the reformers, and provided illustrations for Luther’s German Bible, also painted the naked bodies of the ladies of the Saxon court, including portraying them as nude mythological figures.
In fact, Renaissance artist found that it was easier to paint nude bodies representing pagan or classical themes than Biblical persons, in terms of avoiding church censorship. Even Adam and Eve had to be covered with a fig leaf (although Michelangelo painted a totally nude Adam on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel). The classical subjects also appealed to the Renaissance interest in the revival of classical culture.
The contemporary Italian gay artist, Vittorio Carvelli, whose nude Crucifixion is featured above, has tried to convey the homoeroticism in Italian Renaissance art in his canvas paintings and photography as he evokes the sensuality of ancient Greek and Roman life, as in this torso study.
And since I brought up photographs as art, we should recognize that with the iphone’s camera feature (and maybe the help of a mirror), millions of people around the world are taking and sending nude selfies ranging from below the belt line sexting to attempts at more artistic posing. In spite of the fact that nude selfies stored on icloud or other caches get hacked and nude selfies get posted online, people take the risk. They want to be naked. They’re limited in the number of public places where nudity can be practiced, but in the private venues of their bathroom, bedroom, or living room they take photos of themselves in a state of undress that are sometimes shared with “friends.”
Historically the nude form in art suggested power in men (like Vasquez’s “Male Nude” up above ) and sexuality in women (like Goya’s “La Maja Desnuda up above). Nude self-photographs attempt to imbue the subject (themselves) with both. Hence male nude selfies tend to display erections, as do self-photographed portraits like the following.
Male portraits of nude women (like Goya’s) place women on a bed in a pose suggesting availability. This self-photograph by a woman conveys lack of availability. She seems wrapped up in her own “issues,” as we say.
So What About Modesty?
Modesty is covering the body that God pronounced as “very good.” Objectively considered, from a Biblical perspective we have nothing to be ashamed of. If we have transgressed the limits and have something to hide, we express that (as Adam and Eve did) by covering up. Ironically, therefore, clothing is more an expression of our shame than nakedness is.
It is noteworthy that in some parts of the world, especially among indigenous people, there is less body shame than in Western societies, such as among these San Bushmen in Namibia who are naked by choice in the modern world. Comparing the modern world with traditional societies shows that what is covered or left uncovered varies among societies. Shame associated with nakedness is obviously not a factor in societies that practice almost complete nakedness, just as in our society the amount of covering varies with age, sex, climate location, and other factors.
I don’t expect that our modern societies will change from being enclothed to being naked. For those who don’t live in the tropics, the climate is not conducive to it. The changes in Western fashion down through the ages have shown the body more covered or less covered. The Bible makes no pronouncement about how much covering the body should have. But it gives plenty of examples of ordinary and intentional nakedness (such as David’s dance before the Ark, Isaiah’s nakedness as a form of proclamation, and acts of penitence). The Christ himself accomplished his most important acts of salvation for us in a state of nakedness, but artists have not usually been at liberty to show it except for the naked Christ child (although there have been exceptions; Michelangelo sculpted a nude Christ on a crucifix and as the risen Lord). See Leo Steinberg, The Sexuality of Christ in Renaissance Art and in Modern Oblivion, second edition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983, 1996), in which he demonstrates with many images the portrayal of Christ in the fullness of his manhood by Renaissance artists, often with the barest minimum of modesty.
I reported above experiences of social nakedness that I enjoyed as a youth. These occasions for naked fun obviously diminished as I grew older and had family and professional responsiblities. Some opportunities to experience the naked state anew are available in such venues as the Korean Spa near my home. There are more clothing optional beaches throughout the world that tourists visit. There are events like a naked swim for charity in Sydney, Australia, World Naked Bike Riding Day in cities throughout the world to protest global warming and expose the car culture, and naked hikes through forests on the summer solstice to call attention to environmental concerns. Americans may not be aware that it is not illegal to hike naked in our national parks.
Down on the coast on Cobbler’s Beach in Sydney swimmers assemble for the annual Sydney Skinny Unique. The swim raises money for the Cure Brain Cancer Foundation, established by internationally renowned neurosurgeon Charlie Teo, who also swims in the event which attracts hundreds of people from Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.
One event hosted in many cities around the world in which both women and men can be naked in public is the annual naked bike ride, which is a demonstration against too many automobiles burning fossil fuel and contributing to environmental pollution. Both men and women are given permission to bare all for the cause and enjoy the freedom of riding through town naked. In this event nature in the form of the natural body is brought back into urban life.
I believe that a sacrality accrues to nakedness simply because it is the body’s natural state as God created it and pronounced it good. I don’t think we all need to be naturists, and I doubt that the modern world will return to ancient practices of nudity. But it would be well if more people of all ages experienced the goodness of the body’s naked state and came to appreciate their body in its relationship to the natural world, of which it is a part.
Pastor Frank Senn